Talk:Randomness
From Maze
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 207: | Line 207: | ||
2. "by the very appropriately-named RAND Corporation" suggests that that is why it was so named; but that is inaccurate. I recall its having to do with "research and development." So something like "in hindsight aptly-named RAND" might minimize the risk of misinforming readers accidentally, as it were. | 2. "by the very appropriately-named RAND Corporation" suggests that that is why it was so named; but that is inaccurate. I recall its having to do with "research and development." So something like "in hindsight aptly-named RAND" might minimize the risk of misinforming readers accidentally, as it were. | ||
| − | 3. "(see, for example, Rotenberg's work in the late fifties)" needs further explanation. Who is Rotenberg? What work did he accomplish? A short sentence would be sufficient. I don't know what we are alluding to. | + | 3. Both "(see, for example, Rotenberg's work in the late fifties)" and "(see Green et al.'s work at MIT, with joint support of the U.S. Army, Navy, and Air Force)" ought to be relegated to notes. |
| − | |||
| − | 4. Same for "(see Green et al.'s work at MIT, with joint support of the U.S. Army, Navy, and Air Force)." What work is it in a sentence so anyone can find it? | ||
