Talk:Randomness

From Maze

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 207:Line 207:
2. "by the very appropriately-named RAND Corporation" suggests that that is why it was so named; but that is inaccurate. I recall its having to do with "research and development." So something like "in hindsight aptly-named RAND" might minimize the risk of misinforming readers accidentally, as it were.
2. "by the very appropriately-named RAND Corporation" suggests that that is why it was so named; but that is inaccurate. I recall its having to do with "research and development." So something like "in hindsight aptly-named RAND" might minimize the risk of misinforming readers accidentally, as it were.
−
3.
+
3. "(see, for example, Rotenberg's work in the late fifties)" needs further explanation. Who is Rotenberg? What work did he accomplish? A short sentence would be sufficient. I don't know what we are alluding to.

Revision as of 16:34, 16 July 2011

View this revision of Talk:Randomness.

Personal tools